Book Review: FAITHFUL UNTO DEATH by Stephanie Jaye Evans
Before I get into the review, there’s something I must get off my chest. Namely, two genre words I really do not like: “cozy” and “hard-boiled.” I understand the value of these terms as mystery types, but they are so inappropriate (IMO). To me, “cozy” is granny’s favorite flower-patterned chair with the frilly arm covers. And “hard-boiled” is how I cook my eggs when I’m making a salad. (In fact, I like them 6-minute-boiled, so the yolk is a nice golden color, and still slightly moist. Mmm!) I particularly dislike “cozy,” because many “cozy” mysteries center on a murder, and murder is never “cozy.” Okay, now I’ve vented, let’s get on with the review.
FAITHFUL UNTO DEATH is Stephanie Jaye Evans’s debut novel, and is the inaugural story in her “Sugar Land Mystery” series. The book is set in Sugar Land, a small Texan town that’s home for a mix of regular Southern folk, as well as affluent sports celebrities, doctors, and lawyers. The hero of the story is a Church of Christ pastor named Walker Wells, though his friends and family call him “Bear.” He lives as quiet a life as the pastor of a 1,000-member church can, aided and challenged by his wife, Annie Laurie, and his 14-year-old daughter Jo (he has an older daughter, Merrie, but she’s in college).
In this first mystery, a young girl comes across a dead man while walking past the town’s golf course on her way to school. His head had been beaten in with a golf club. Bear was acquainted with the dead man, but not so much that he wants get involved in the investigation. But the man’s wife was active in Bear’s church, and it seems Bear might have been the last person the man spoke to. As the story progresses, Bear’s own curiosity, and the fact that the investigation keeps intersecting with his life, draws him in deeper, and gets him into more trouble than he bargained for.
Overall, I enjoyed this book. It’s written as a first-person narrative from Bear’s perspective, and the voice is believable. If you live in the South, as I do, you’ll find a familiarity to the tone, the atmosphere, the cadence of speech, and the lifestyle. Stephanie has captured it all well, I think.
A good portion of the story seems to focus on Bear’s interactions with his family, and painting a portrait of the town and its people. Given that this is the first in a series set in this same town, I think that kind of world-building is inevitable and necessary. But it’s not all irrelevant, as it helps to give context and familiarize us with the characters–and potential suspects. An important undercurrent to the story is Bear’s strained relationship with his 14-year-old daughter. I cringed a few times at the way he spoke to her and tried to deal with her rebellion, but I have five daughters, two of whom are teens, and one is a pre-teen, so I understand how hard it can be to say the right thing (and how easy it is to get it wrong!).
Bear himself is an interesting character. We would not see eye-to-eye on some important issues of theology and church government, but for a work of fiction that’s okay. The story is not advocating his theology, it’s telling his story, so I set my objections aside. Indeed, I’ve known pastors like Bear, so his character is very believable. The only quibble I would have is that on occasion he veered a little too close to the “Disney father” stereotype I have come to loathe (i.e., the dad who never gets anything right, who looks to his wife for guidance and leadership because he’s too incompetent to be the head of his household so he leaves it up to her, and who is completely dominated by his smarter teenage kids–if you’ve watched any of the popular sit-coms on the Disney Channel, you’ll know what I mean). But he only veers close–and more often than not, he shows himself to be a very human pastor, trying to do what’s right in an increasingly complex situation.
One other interesting aspect of the story I want to comment on is the character of the detective and his relationship to Bear. Detective Wanderley really doesn’t need Bear’s help in the investigation, and, in fact, more than once says that Bear should get his nose out and let Wanderley do his job. Wanderley comes across as arrogant and self-important, but he is also good at what he does. On occasion Bear discovers something only to find that Wanderley had already figured it out. Sparks fly naturally between the two men–Wanderley taking Bear’s interest as a slight against his abilities, and Bear feeling as though Wanderley is too full of himself to allow for outside assistance. Through the course of the story, though, you see the two men attempt to find respect for one another, and I suspect this is a relationship that will build as the series progresses.
The pace of the story is comfortable, with some good twists, and interesting characters. I would rate the language PG13, with a handful of s-words, and a few g-ds. If you like mysteries, this is one that’ll keep you guessing. The murderer isn’t obvious, and there are plenty of suspects to choose from.
When I was little, my sister and I had a band called Sugarland, named after that same small town. Now there actually is a band called Sugarland. And a new mystery series. What IS it about that place?
Thorough review, Colin. I’m not a big mystery reader myself, but I might have to check this one out. Sounds like the start of a promising series.
Stephanie lives in Sugar Land, I believe. I’m not sure she’s ever owned up to how many of the characters are completely fictional… π I’ve often thought it would be interesting to set a story somewhere real, where people could actually visit the landmarks you talk about.
Thanks, Bess! π
Oooh! Summer is my favorite time to read mysteries of any kind, so I will definitely be checking this one out! You do make an excellent point about Disney Dads– it is so frustrating to watch that kind of buffoonery — or watch my girls watch it — when their own dad is so engaged and hands-on. Thanks for the rec, Colin!
You’re welcome, Erica! I suppose one of the up-sides of the “Disney Dad” is it challenges me to model the opposite in my own house. The best argument against the Disney Dad is not to be one. If enough of us do that, perhaps Disney will rethink. π
I’m going to watch the “Disney Dad” problem. When your protagonist is a preacher, you walk a fine line between making him offensively perfect or ridiculously flawed. Or you could go the Night of the Hunter route (Robert Mitchum is the scariest preacher ever!). I’m grateful to Colin for his careful read and review of Faithful Unto Death. I’ll do better in Safe From Harm–the second in the series.
Thank you, Stephanie, for your comment, but most of all for a very enjoyable book. As an aspiring writer, with my background in theology the preacher protagonist would seem like a no-brainer. But as you say, it’s fraught with challenges, including balancing his high morality with his humanity. I applaud you for going for it anyway, and I think you’ve done a good job. I look forward to getting to know Bear better over the series. π
What a great review, Colin. I don’t read a lot of “grown up” mystery, but this one sounds promising. I’m curious what Bear’s theology is now, based on what you’ve said, and on the story itself. Might check it out.
I have to say, I’d never put my finger on what bothers me about the Disney sit-coms, but you’ve nailed it. I already don’t allow the kiddo in my life to watch “human” Disney (or a few of the cartoon shows, for that matter) because they’re still too young for the humor and subject matter – nothing wrong with it, just still too mature for mine. π
So, what’s next from the summer reading list?
Thanks, Daisy! Bear’s theology is not crucial to the story, so I don’t mind not telling you if it will entice you to read the book! π
The best thing on the Disney Channel, IMO, is Phineas and Ferb. They should just cancel everything else and run Phineas and Ferb 24/7. I think the ratings would improve, if not the average quality of programming. π Speaking of parents, the example we have on Ph & F is that of a blended family where the siblings all treat each other as blood relatives. The older sister is annoyed by her little brothers, but loves them. The parents are both respected and obeyed by their children, though both mom and dad are eccentric. And the dad is English–how much better can it get? I could extol the virtues of Ph & F for ages. Suffice to say, it’s one of my favorite shows on TV, and I have absolutely no fear at all of any of my kids watching it.
I’m with ya on Phineas and Ferb! Such a fabulous show! And you’re right – the parents and their relationship with the kids sets a great example. Perry and Dr. D usually steal the show for me (and Major Monogram – he and Carl are hilarious!). I don’t know if I’d want it on Disney 24/7 because I also like Doc McStuffin and Octonauts. Maybe we could still have those from 7-8 every morning? π