Who Review: Asylum of the Daleks
And so New Series Season 7 begins: the season that will take us into Doctor Who’s 50th year. And this is quite an opener. The Doctor meets up with his most famous foe once more, but this time there’s a twist. Instead of trying to thwart some evil Dalek scheme, the Doctor has been summoned (i.e., lured via trickery) by the Dalek Parliament to help them–save them, even! They have a planet called the Asylum on which they keep all the most mentally unstable Daleks. They’re a danger even to their own kind, hence they are trapped on this planet, surrounded by a force field that prevents their escape. However, a ship called the Alaska recently crashed on the planet, rupturing the force field, threatening the escape of these looney Daleks. The obvious solution would be for the Daleks to go down and destroy them. But the Daleks can’t bring themselves to destroy such “beauty” (i.e., beauty as they know it, which is pure, unadulterated, hatred and evil) face-to-face. They could destroy the planet remotely–except that the force field has only been ruptured. It would need to be completely deactivated for them to blow the place up. The Daleks are too scared to go down themselves to do it, so they want to send the Doctor. And since it is a fact that “the Doctor always has companions,” they’ve summoned Amy and Rory to help. At the point of their summoning, Amy and Rory are separated, and have just completed the paperwork to finalize their divorce, and the Doctor is presumed to be dead (see last series’s finale, “The Wedding of River Song”).
Added to this mix is the fact that there are nanogenes hovering around the planet (remember the microscopic bots that recreate matter, as seen in Moffat’s [i.e., Steven Moffat, show-runner, and writer of this episode] first New Who story, “The Empty Child”?). These threaten to turn any living thing that visits into a Dalek. To protect them, the Dalek Parliament give our trio bracelets to wear that will fend off the nanogenes. Furthermore, there is a survivor on board the Asylum: the entertainment director, who also happens to be a genius–Oswin Oswald. She offers to help them turn off the force field, in return for being rescued.
Can the Doctor save the Daleks, save Oswin, and save Rory and Amy’s marriage? That’s the basic set up…
SPOILER ALERT!! My comments may (and likely will) contain spoilers for those that haven’t seen the episode. If you want to stay spoiler-free, please watch the story before you continue reading!
Moffat rested the Daleks last series, which is not a bad thing to do. As the Doctor’s most popular enemy, they tend to get wheeled out fairly regularly, and Moffat’s not the first to appreciate that audiences need a break from them every once in a while. In the Second Doctor story, “The Evil of the Daleks” in 1968, they were supposedly destroyed. The Daleks didn’t reappear until they were brought back by popular demand for the 1972 Third Doctor season opener, “Day of the Daleks.”
Asylum is Steven Moffat’s first attempt at a Dalek story, and I think he did a really good job. He didn’t take away any of their malice, even though they were calling on the Doctor for help (an interesting twist). The Parliament of Daleks was well realized (if you didn’t know, every form of Dalek from 1963 to the 2010 re-design was represented on the Parliament), and I think it was a good premise for the story.
I’m not a fan of Amy Pond. Sorry, I know she has a large following, but I much prefer Rory; and frankly, the way she treats Rory is one of the reasons why I don’t think much of her character. I’m glad this episode rocked her world a bit. She started out afraid of nothing, and ended up clearly petrified. Rory’s speech to her when he thought she was going to be Dalekified by the nanogenes was passionate and honest. And also showed the loyalty and love in his heart, which, for me, makes him one of the best male companions the Doctor has ever had. Rory will face things he doesn’t like (e.g., the fact that his love for Amy is not equally reciprocated), but not indulge in self-pity because of them. He gets on with what needs to be done. Which to me, frankly, makes him a heck of a lot braver than Amy.
And what about the surprise in the first ten minutes? I did a double-take. Isn’t that…? Yes… Jenna-Louise Coleman?!Β But isn’t she…? Indeed, Moffat, with an unusually complicit press, managed to surprise us by introducing the new companion at the beginning of episode one! She wasn’t playing the companion this time, rather, she was the helpful Oswin. And at this point it’s hard to see how she might become the new companion by the time the Christmas special rolls around. As you might expect, Moffat is keeping tight-lipped about that. All we know is that we’ve seen her. The TARDIS crew don’t know what she looks like. And… we’ll have to wait and see how that plays out. But 10-out-of-10 to Steven Moffat for a well-executed piece of deception, and perhaps a clever companion introduction in the making!
Remember the bit when the Doctor walks past all the Daleks who survived battles with him, and a series of planets are named? Did anyone else pick up on the fact that all of those were from classic Who stories? I recognized a couple (Exxilon from “Death to the Daleks,” Vulcan from “Power of the Daleks,” and Spiridon from “Planet of the Daleks”), and the others I looked up (Kemble from “The Dalek Master Plan” and Aridius from “The Chase”).
And what about Jenna-Louise Coleman? I thought she did a fine job in the role she had. Will this be her character at Christmas? Part of me hopes not. She’s a bit too sassy and brainiac. I’ve had enough sass from Amy to last many lifetimes, and the Doctor has been upstaged by his assistants one too many times for my liking. The show’s called “Doctor Who,” after all. Let’s remember who’s supposed to be the hero and the smartest one in the room. Please?
It seems that Moffat has a story arc in place now, and it’s one he hinted at with last series’ finale: the Doctor is supposedly dead, and he is now the mysterious Doctor Who? roaming around the universe. With the Daleks’ memory banks wiped of all references to the Doctor, he has become Doctor Who even for them. At the end of last series, he wanted to be forgotten, but there’s still unfinished business. In that story, the Dorium–the head in a box–warned of prophecies, including “the fall of the Eleventh.” I suspect this will factor into the coming series. But hopefully not too much. I hope Moffat keeps the story arc loose and light, and focuses on giving us some great individual stories, regardless of how they fit into his master plan.
Did you see Asylum of the Daleks? If so, what did you think? Share your insights, loves, hates, or anything else you want to share about Doctor Who in the comments!
I thought it was massively underwhelming. I felt like I’d come into a story halfway through and the whole opening 20 minutes was duuuuull and needed serious trimming. Seriously, Moffat, less is more sometimes!
As I dislike Amy, I don’t think I’m ever going to really enjoy Eleven’s episodes until she’s gone.
I think I’ll stick to my series 3 and 4 DVDs.
I can certainly agree with you on two points, Cole: 1) Amy. And 2) that Moffat isn’t nearly as good a writer for Doctor Who when he’s show-running than when he’s not. While I clearly enjoyed the episode more than you, I will concede that the stories Moffat wrote for Russell T. Davies were far superior than anything he’s written over the past couple of years.
I think Matt Smith is a good Doctor, and there are others writing quality scripts (it seems Neil Gaiman might be writing another story for next series), and that keeps me engaged despite Amy. But Christmas is coming… π
I feel *very* sorry for Matt Smith because the stories he’s had just haven’t given him the chance to really shine. I like him and I feel like I should like him even more, but the plots and the characters just drag him down.
Then there’s what happened to River Song. UUUUUUGH!
“Vincent and the Doctor” and “The Doctor’s Wife” are two of the best stories Matt’s had so far, IMO. Did you see the Sarah Jane Adventures story with the Eleventh Doctor? The first time Russell T. Davies had written for him (Moffat wrote the post-regeneration scene in “The End of Time Part 2”). That was good. π
*sigh*–River Song. She was an interesting idea in “Silence in the Library,” as were the Weeping Angels in “Blink.” But sometimes you have to learn to let go. Fans may say “we want more!” but the fans are not always right. At the end of the 1980s–just before the show was put on “extended hiatus”–one of the things Script Editor Andrew Cartmel wanted to do was return the mystery to Doctor Who. He felt we’d got to know him too well. I fear we’re getting to that point. Evidently, the Doctor must have had a spouse at some time, since he had a granddaughter. But do we really need to know the whole backstory? Drop hints, and leave questions, absolutely. But we don’t need to be told every story. And we certainly don’t need a soap opera. π
I think it was good start to what’s going to be a great season. It wasn’t the most brilliant DW episode I’ve ever seen but it was a good one.
I wasn’t a fan of Jenna-Louise when she was announced to be the next companion, but I am now. I actually really love Oswin. I didn’t get the feeling that she’s going to “upstage” the Doctor; more that they’re going to play really well off each other. I look forward to seeing how she gets out of her current form and becomes the new companion.
Amy isn’t my favorite female companion ever, but I do love her. I absolutely adore Rory. He breaks my heart every time. I’m scared to see them leave. They’ve gone through so much (TWO THOUSAND YEARS HE WAITED) and I just want them to be happy.
I’m so psyched for this weekend. Dinosaurs on a spaceship, Rupert Graves, and the guy who played Mr. Weasley? Bring it on!
That’s why I said “Part of me…” about Jenna. I realize what we see here may not be what we get at Christmas. I don’t have a problem with clever companions (Romana I was one of my faves–and she was a Time Lady), just as long was we all remember who the hero is. π But from Jenna’s performance, I agree she has the potential to be a great companion.
They do have quite a cast for Saturday. Isn’t Filtch there too? This is the kind of status Who had in its heyday back in the 70s/80s, when major Brit celebs readily accepted invitations to be on the show. In fact, one might argue that Who has never been as popular, and as high-profile, as it is now. The viewing figures for BBC America this past weekend were record-breaking, and it won the time slot in the UK.
Bring it on, indeed! π
I feel exactly the same about Moffat right now. As a one-off writer for Dr Who he really showed his strength and gave the best episodes of the RTD era. But I haven’t been a fan of him as the big cheese. He doesn’t do arcs particularly well and last season wasn’t my favourite. The whole River scenario was a bit too soap opera.
But I enjoyed this episode. It did exactly what I’ve felt has been lacking since they brought Dr Who back: scary Daleks. We were in desperate need of a Dalek break and I thought Moffat did a good job in bringing them back on the scene and scaring me. I was absolutely creeped out by the nanogenes conversion and the insane Daleks.
Matt Smith continues to be brilliant. I honestly love him as the Doctor. I can’t help it. He’s just this odd man-child who makes you face palm so much with all the chaos he gets himself in to. He’s such a troublesome thing you feel like you should put him on a leash and watch him at all times otherwise he’ll be off and getting into trouble.
I have liked Amy on certain occasions. Whenever they’ve shown her most vulnerable side (when Rory died the first time, when he almost died on the pirate ship episode, waiting for the Raggedy Doctor and giving birth etc) she’s perfect. She’s human and there’s love there. But I can’t excuse her behaviour when she’s a cow and treats Rory like crap. And I love Rory. I think the writers should consider more male companions in the future.
Jenna’s cameo surprised me a lot but then again it does seem to be a Doctor Who tradition to cast new companions who have been on before (Donna) or have been in another role (Martha, Amy) so I figured this was a tester. Maybe how they decided to cast Jenna or sort of testing her out on the audience a bit. I think she’ll be good. π
I agree with you about the River Song arc. I don’t mind story arcs as a whole, but I prefer the idea having good, self-contained stories that take the Doctor (and companion) on an adventure, they solve a problem, and move on. Yes, there should be character growth, learning, etc. And even a build up toward a finale… but less of the soap opera! π One of the best-executed arcs in recent years was, IMO, series 3. Each story could stand-alone, but there were little things–references to Saxon, the introduction of the fob watch–that all played into the finale with the Master’s return. Very well done.
This was certainly a better Dalek story than “Victory of the Daleks” (though I generally like Mark Gatiss’ writing). I like Matt Smith’s awkward take on the Doctor, which is quite a departure from both the previous two incarnations. He’s a bit more Second and Seventh Doctor, with a touch of Fourth. And with a good measure of his own quirkiness! He’s by no means my favorite Doctor, but still good.
There hasn’t been a male companion since Turlough in the Fifth Doctor’s second and third series (1983-4), so it’s about time. I think Rory’s proven that the male companion works well. From a story-telling perspective, with a male lead it does help to have a female companion to provide an alternative POV that a guy wouldn’t necessarily consider (and as a point of identification for the girls in the audience–something of a new phenomenon for Doctor Who!). But one might argue that since the Doctor’s an alien, the whole male-female thing doesn’t apply. The way he acts and thinks won’t necessarily fall into our preconceived gender types. There’s an essay in that thought, I’m sure! π
I wondered at first if Jenna was cast based on her performance in this episode… but I’m not sure. There’s something about the secrecy surrounding her appearance in this story that makes me think Moffat has a plan. It’ll all come out eventually, no doubt. π
Yes, series 3! My absolute favourite arc and series overall. That series felt like it had really been planned from the start. Every little detail and I loved it. A great example to all writers. Loved the episodes, Martha’s character and John Simm. I loved him in Life on Mars so I was looking forward to seeing him as the Master and he was incredible. Upstaged David Tennant IMO π
Looking forward to the 50th anniversary! I really hope we get a few cameos from the previous Doctors. I would also like to see if they do anything about the Doctor’s daughter and granddaughter. I wonder if they’ll ever return or at least be acknowledged.
I read the book HUMAN NATURE before seeing the episode. The book is a 7th Doctor adventure, and he uses a cricket ball, not a fob watch. So the substitution for the fob watch in the TV adaptation seemed a little odd at the time. But then when Professor Yana pulled out his fob watch… that was an “o my goodness!!!!” moment. Pure genius! And John Simm pulled off the insane Master perfectly. I watched him in Life on Mars after seeing him in Who, and it seemed strange at first watching him as a good guy. But he was really good in LoM–a great actor. And he has said he’d do a regeneration scene if they want to bring the Master back again… which seems sort of inevitable for next year. I mean, you can’t have a 50th anniversary celebration without the Master!
And although the first three Doctors are no longer with us, and the remaining five classic Doctors are aging… it’s amazing what they can do with computers these days. I hope they do an “Eleven Doctors,” or something like that. Yeah, it might be a bit cheesy, but it would be fun! π