Who Review: Dinosaurs on a Spaceship

One of the things that makes Doctor Who appealing to such a wide audience is the fact that the nature of the show allows for a wide range of themes and moods. Sometimes we get highly emotive drama (e.g., “Father’s Day” from new series 1, or “Human Nature/The Family of Blood” from new series 3), sometimes scare-your-pants-off thrills (e.g., “The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances” from new series 1, or “Blink” from new series 3). Other times the adventures can be dark and a bit edgy (e.g., “The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit” from new series 2, or “Midnight” from new series 4), or more comedic (“Love and Monsters” from new series 2, or “Closing Time” from new series 6). Often, the stories fall somewhere on a continuum between all of these.

“Dinosaurs on a Spaceship” definitely leaned more on the lighter, comedic side, though there was a good dose of drama and excitement too. In this second story of series 7, the Doctor gathers a “gang” consisting of the ancient Egyptian ruler Queen Nefertiti, Edwardian big-game hunter John Riddell, Amy and Rory, and, unwittingly, Rory’s dad, Brian. He takes this gang aboard a ship in the 22nd century that is drifting toward Earth. The Indian Space Agency is getting ready to shoot it down, but the Doctor has found a precious cargo on board that he wants to save if he can: dinosaurs. But how did the dinosaurs get to be there? Whose ship was this–and where are they now? And can the Doctor save everyone before they’re all blown to oblivion?

SPOILER ALERT!! My comments may (and likely will) contain spoilers for those that haven’t seen the episode. If you want to stay spoiler-free, please watch the story before you continue reading!

The last time dinosaurs were featured so prominently in a Doctor Who story, it was “Invasion of the Dinosaurs” from 1974. If you read my review of the DVD release, you’ll know that the dinosaur effects were–um–less than impressive. Thankfully, with modern CGI and animatronics, and a much larger budget, the Doctor Who production team are able to come up with creatures that are much more believable. Of course, audiences today expect no less.

I know the lighter tone to the episode frustrates some of the more serious Whovians, but that’s the nature of the show. Not every story is going to be a hit with everyone (indeed, some fans of the show are so picky about even the best episodes, one wonders why they keep watching!). Some have hinted that this story is a bit of comedy relief before the next three episodes, where things take a turn for the decidedly grim. I wouldn’t be surprised.

Some reviewers have critiqued the plot, complaining that having Rory’s dad there was a convenient fix to the problem of having a pair of genetically-compatible people to pilot the ship. I shake my head. First, like it or not, “coincidences” like this happen in real life: you need something, and you just happen to have it in your pocket, or your wife has what you need in her purse/handbag. Maybe life is one big convenient plot device… but that sounds like a theme for one of my theological posts. In any case, suck it up, I say. Chris Chibnall, this episode’s writer, says he had requested the addition of Rory’s father to the story because we’ll soon be saying goodbye to Rory, and we know so little about his family. Frankly, I like the little story arc both Rory and Brian go through here. During this adventure, Brian gets to see his son in the context of his life with Amy and the Doctor. It seems he had never even seen Rory’s nursing skills before. Rory gets to see his father broaden his horizons from being someone who hardly ever left home, to someone willing to fly a spaceship and marvel at the world (and universe) outside his front door.

The Silurian cameo was a nice touch that provided a plausible reason why dinosaurs would be on a spaceship. The way the Doctor deals with Solomon, the black market trader, seems a bit harsh and un-Doctor-like… but it’s not really. Recall the way he dealt with Cassandra in “The End of the World” (series 1), the Sycorax leader in “The Christmas Invasion” (the 2005 Christmas Special), the children of the Racnoss in “The Runaway Bride” (the 2006 Christmas Special), and so on. We know the Doctor has a dark edge to him, and there are limits to his compassion.

The title appears to be a play on the movie “Snakes on a Plane,” though no-one has confirmed that to be the case. From what I gather, the story developed from the title–“Dinosaurs on a Spaceship” as a concept came first. It seems some reviewers have a problem with this, as if it was a dodgy idea that needed a lot of work to make it tenable. As someone who writes fiction, it sounds to me like a great writing challenge that Mr. Chibnall pulled off quite successfully.

Aside from Amy Pond (and I’ve told you all before that I don’t like Amy Pond’s character, so any griping on my part about her is pointless), the only thing about this story I really didn’t like was the opening, where Nefertiti is trying to have her way with the Doctor. I understand that in 21st century Doctor Who, the Doctor is allowed to show affection to his female assistants, and smooching is not out of the question. But let’s not get carried away. If we’re trying to say that Nefratiti was a bit of a wild girl–which seems consistent with the banter between her and Riddell–that doesn’t mean she would be like that with anything in trousers. It almost feels as if show-runner Steven Moffat thinks we need periodic doses of this to keep things interesting. Speaking for myself and my family: no, we don’t, thanks.

Overall, a good episode, and consistent with the high standard we’ve come to expect of the writing and acting on Doctor Who. Definitely lighter than “Asylum of the Daleks,” but that’s okay. Doctor Who hasn’t survived fifty years by being predictable.

cds

Colin D. Smith, writer of blogs and fiction of various sizes.

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. Robin Moran says:

    I enjoyed it. For me Doctor Who is fun and if I had a family of my own, this would be what we’d do on a Saturday. Sit together and watch the show. It’s always been silly. How serious can it be when it describes time and space as timey-wimey wibbly wobbly? What I liked about the dinosaurs was that it felt like a bit of a reference to old Who and the old episodes which Moffat has been fantastic at doing. ]I hope he honours Old Who a lot in the 50th anniversary.

    I liked the inclusion of Rory’s dad. After a while the companions can’t really keep the Doctor out of their family’s lives. They all found out eventually and even get involved. That’s always been the case so far with New Who. As for the Doctor’s dark side, that characteristic has already been set in previous Doctors. I’ve just finished the first ever serial and William Hartnell’s Doctor didn’t even want to help the caveman who got attacked by a beast and this was an innocent character. He was quite happy to just walk away and leave him to die. It was refreshing to see Matt Smith’s character go a little dark. He’s been quite bubbly so far and it just gives him another side to his Doctor.

    Also, Rory is 31? Now, has he always been older than Amy or have they been waiting a ridiculous amount of time again for the Doctor? In the first series Amy was only in her early 20s and I assumed Rory was around the same age and in her year at school.

    • cds says:

      Back in 2005, when the re-boot launched, Russell T. Davies made the point that in the classic series, the Doctor would snatch people from their lives (e.g., Ian, Barbara, Jo Grant, Sarah Jane Smith, etc.) and take them on adventures, but without any real sense of what their sudden disappearance meant for their friends, families, and loved ones. He thought it important for us to see how Rose’s decision to travel in the TARDIS affected Mickey and her mum. For those of us who grew up on the classic series, “Aliens of London” was a landmark episode. We may have speculated about the companions’ families–but now RTD was showing us that traveling with the Doctor has consequences for those left behind. This theme continued with Martha and Donna, and now with Amy and Rory. I think it’s a good perspective to bring to the show.

      As for the Doctor’s dark side… did you notice that the First Doctor picked up a rock and was about to put that caveman out of his misery so he wouldn’t be a burden to them? If I recall correctly, it was Ian who stopped him. In the next story (“The Daleks”), the Doctor lies to his companions to get them to leave the TARDIS and explore the planet. And then in “The Edge of Destruction,” the Doctor turns on Ian and Barbara, thinking them to be conspiring against him! He has certainly mellowed with age, but for all his silliness and heroics, the Doctor has an edge to him too. And I agree–it’s good to see that come out every now and again.

      Interesting point about Rory’s age. Was Rory in Amy’s year at school? Have we been told or shown this, or is this just something we would assume? Was the mention of Rory’s age at this point significant? I suppose we’ll find out!

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Robin! πŸ™‚

      • Miss Cole says:

        Interesting that you mention Amy and Rory’s families in comparison with Rose, Martha and Donna. The latter three’s families were a key part of the story throughout their respective series whereas we’ve met Rory’s Dad once and Amy’s parents once at her wedding *after* they’ve been returned from the dead or whatever they were at the start of season 5. And whatever happened to whoever was looking after her as she grew up?

        I feel very disconnected from Amy and Rory’s families. Rose’s mum resonated because she was a single mum whose only daughter was off gallivanting the universe with a stranger. Martha’s family dynamic really came across because she was the one everyone turned to. And Donna’s mum was awful to her but she had her wonderful granddad. All three had family situations all of us could, in some way, totally relate to. These relationships are, for me, completely absent for Amy and Rory, and the sudden inclusion of Rory’s dad wasn’t enough to get me through this episode.

        Unfortunately, I won’t be watching the show anymore. I’m hoping I’ll be tempted back in the future, as I was with series three after the blahness of series two. Yes, me, fangirl of Ten, HATED his first series. But for now, I’m finished with it.

        • cds says:

          I totally agree that there hasn’t been nearly as much effort to include the companions’ families since Moffat took the reins. And while I think it’s a good thing to do (as RTD did with Rose, Martha, and Donna), it doesn’t bother me as much that SM has not paid as much attention to that aspect. Perhaps because I’m used to that not being a part of Doctor Who–I don’t know. And maybe SM didn’t involve the families as much because they weren’t integral to the stories, as they were with previous companions. Again, that’s okay with me. It’s “Doctor Who,” after all, not “Doctor Who & Co.” πŸ™‚

          While I don’t share the depth of your annoyance, Cole, I respect, and to some degree understand it. You might want to stick with the show for the next few weeks, though, if only to see Amy and Rory go. And one observation: the last time The Doctor took the attitude he did toward Solomon (i.e., above the law and able to do as he sees fit, in this case acting as Solomon’s judge, jury, and executioner), was in “The Waters of Mars.” And we know what happened to the Doctor soon after. That would be a stunning end to the 50th anniversary series. πŸ™‚

          • Robin Moran says:

            I did notice. I was shocked at first because I think that’s the darkest I’ve seen the Doctor but it fits with this first one’s character. It was interesting when although he has an ocassional dark side now the new Doctors will do their best to save people and aliens.

            I totally get how disappointed you’ve been Cole. Last series was an absolute mess and it has made me miss and appreciate RTD more. I don’t think Amy is a well written companion either. They do make it hard for me to like her at times even though I love her relationship and history with the Doctor. I don’t see why her bad attitude is necessary at times. She can be too nasty to the point where it makes her completely unlikeable.

            In the flashbacks of Amy’s life growing up with Mel (BFF/daughter/trained assassin-psychopath) Rory appears the same age as them. Unless he could be older by just 2 or 3 years. It’s either poor continuity (which the show does have an issue with at times) or the Doctor is supposed to have been in and out of their lives for quite a while since they were introduced. Amy may supposed to be 27/28 by now.

            You know, Colin, that would be a great time to regenerate. I’d be sad to see him go but how fantastic would it be for the new actor to come in as such an important time in the Doctor Who fandom? I’d be honoured, that’s for sure! =D I can’t help it but my expectations are increasing for the 50th anniversary. I can’t wait!

            • Miss Cole says:

              Colin, be glad you don’t share the depth of my annoyance. I wish I didn’t have it! I think it’s why I need to stop watching for a while. If it gets better, I can always catch up on the BBC’s iPlayer.

              Robin, the sad thing is even though I loved RTD’s era, I was super excited for Moffat’s because he wrote some of the most amazing episodes. For his era to be so frustrating, especially when his other show, Sherlock, is so good, just annoys me. And Amy is so unrealistic I just can’t deal with her anymore.

              • cds says:

                Interestingly, Sherlock is actually a joint venture between Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss, and I believe Moffat leaves most of the Sherlock work to Gatiss since Moffat’s working on Doctor Who for 9 months of the year. I’m becoming more and more convinced that Moffat’s a better writer when he doesn’t have the pressure of Executive Producer too.

                That said, Doctor Who is still great TV, and better than a lot of the other stuff on TV these days.

Share your thoughts... I usually reply!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.