Who Review: Robot of Sherwood

The Doctor invites Clara to pick a time and place to visit. To his surprise, she wants to meet Robin Hood. The Doctor laughs off her suggestion saying that Robin Hood is just a legend; he doesn’t exist. Nevertheless, Clara insists and the Doctor relents. Arriving in Sherwood Forest c. 1190 AD, the Doctor is greeted by an arrow shot by a man in green claiming to be Robin Hood. This Robin then introduces the Doctor and Clara to his band of outlaws: Friar Tuck, Little John, and so on. The Doctor is determined to demonstrate they can’t actually be Robin and his Merry Men, but the strange machinations of the Sheriff of Nottingham take priority. It seems he has an army of robots, and his designs stretch a little beyond controlling this little patch of medieval England…

SPOILER ALERT!! My comments may (and likely will) contain spoilers for those that haven’t seen the episode. If you want to stay spoiler-free, please watch the story before you continue reading!

Mark Gatiss, veteran New Series writer and Steven Moffat’s “Sherlock” partner-in-crime, wrote this fun romp that is, he admits, a bit of an homage to the Mel Brooks movie “Robin Hood: Men in Tights.” So, yes, there’s a healthy dose of humor, but the story isn’t without its darker side. The Sheriff is ruthless and merciless, as is evident from the way he treats the villagers. There are some good fight sequences, starting with Robin and the Doctor (armed only with a spoon), but progressing on to the battles with the robots, and finally Robin’s high-wire encounter with the Sheriff. These were well directed and in the vain of classic sword fights where the opponents heckle each other in the midst of combat. The Doctor’s snarky skepticism is, I think, a change from 10 and 11, and harkens back a little more to the First Doctor. We’ve come to know a Doctor who is open-minded and willing to stand corrected if things aren’t quite what he thought them to be at first. Twelve remains a Hood-denier almost until the end of the episode, when he leaves Robin a gift that appears to show a concession. However, I must admit to feeling some of the Doctor’s reluctance to believe this is really Robin Hood–but more on that in a moment.

I thought it interesting Gatiss and Moffat would take on a Who-meets-Hood story. Usually, the Doctor’s encounters with historical figures have been rooted in solid fact. There really was a Marco Polo, a Richard I, an H. G. Wells, a Queen Victoria, a Winston Churchill, and so on. I can only think of two other occasions where a Who story has involved the legendary, or near-mythical. The first was a First Doctor story called “The Myth Makers” where the Doctor, Stephen, and Vicki land in Ancient Greece and get embroiled in the Trojan War, helping the Greeks to construct the infamous Trojan Horse. The second was the Seventh Doctor story “Battlefield,” where Morgaine comes to visit, and the Doctor and Ace encounter Excalibur, and find Arthur’s body. I must say, though, I came away from this Robin Hood story still uncertain of how much of the Hood legend was introduced by the Doctor and Clara… or, indeed, if the Doctor may have been right to be skeptical all along…

Which brings me to curious plot points. There’s something about this story that felt to me like it was setting us up for something later. The fact that all the Robin Hood story elements just happened to be there as expected, including the traditional attire, and even Robin pining for his Maid Marian–it just all seemed too on-point, like it was a set-up. Maybe Clara’s memories of the Robin Hood legend were being used by someone to draw them into a bigger plan. Then there’s the ship fueled by gold. Whenever gold is a plot point in Doctor Who, I think Cybermen. In the classic series, Cybermen had a strong aversion to gold. The Cybermen in “Nightmare in Silver” received an upgrade patch to overcome this, but maybe we’re dealing with Cybermen who don’t have that patch? This wouldn’t be the first time the Cybermen have used humans to handle gold for them (see “Revenge of the Cybermen”). And the fact of the Sheriff being a cyborg…? The last curious and subtle point is the Doctor’s doodlings on the blackboard during the pre-title sequence. I have no idea what that’s about, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s significant. Maybe the Doctor knows something’s afoot and he’s playing along…?

Shortly before the episode was broadcast, the BBC announced that a portion of the episode involving the beheading of “a character” had been cut in light of the recent terrorist executions of American journalists. Subsequent to the episode airing, a couple of websites published the missing portion as it was in the script, and others summarized what happened. In short, during Robin and the Sheriff’s climactic fight, the Sheriff knocks Robin to the ground and puts his sword to Robin’s neck. The Doctor throws a tapestry over the Sheriff and Robin decapitates him. Just as they begin to celebrate, the Sheriff’s head rolls out from the tapestry and begins to talk, explaining that the robots’ spaceship had landed on him, and they saved his life by making him into a cyborg. The Sheriff’s body grabs Clara, Robin throws the Sheriff’s head back to his body, they reunite, and the fight continues as broadcast. I can understand the reasoning behind the cut, but, as others have pointed out, this scene helps makes sense of the rest of the story: the Sheriff’s reference to being the first of a new “half-man half-machine” race, the fact his hand could grab the edge of the vat of molten gold despite his body being dead, and, of course, the title of the story–“Robot of Sherwood,” not “Robots of Sherwood.” As you might expect, Whovians are split as to whether the cut really mattered, and some even feel the story was better without this scene. As yet, no-one has said which version will make it to DVD/Blu-Ray.

What did you think? Do you agree with my plot-point theories? Do you have any to add? Did you notice the edit? Are you glad, indifferent, or annoyed that the BBC cut that sequence? Share your thoughts in the comments!

cds

Colin D. Smith, writer of blogs and fiction of various sizes.

You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. I didn’t know about that scene being cut but it would have the Sheriff’s line about being a new breed make more sense. I thought that was a weird line and had no idea where it came from. Maybe the director figured people would know since the cut scene had been posted on some websites and people would watch it.

    I enjoyed this episode. The bickering between the Doctor and Robin Hood was hilarious.

    • cds says:

      Cutting the scene was a tough call, and I guess they decided making sense of the Sheriff’s line and the title of the episode wasn’t as important as being sensitive to the families of the journalists. Either way they were going to upset people. I wouldn’t be surprised if the uncut episode is on the DVD/Blu-Ray since enough time will have passed by then, and people can choose whether or not they watch it.

      It was a fun episode, which makes me all the more suspicious that there’s more to it. πŸ™‚

  2. Rachael says:

    I wasn’t actually aware of the scene being cut. I understand why they would cut that bit, though I do think that the ending would have made more sense with it.

    I kind of wish I’d known that the episode would play off Robin Hood: Men in Tights (which I love) before I watched it. I felt like something was off because, while I enjoyed the bickering, I was expecting something more serious.

    I agree that something is definitely going on, but I really hope Clara’s memories weren’t being used to draw them into a bigger plan. It reminds me too much of Amy, the Romans, and the Pandorica.

    • cds says:

      I agree with you, Rachael–the fun and witty banter was enjoyable, but I expected something a bit darker and more sinister. Because of that I was looking for signs of something else going on, so I wouldn’t be surprised if elements of this story come back to haunt the Doctor in the finale.

  3. Robin Moran says:

    So far I’ve enjoyed all three episodes. It’s been a good start to Doctor Who. Usually by now we’ve had an episode that I wasn’t quite fussed about. Each episode I’m sold on Capaldi more and more, especially with his 1st and 9th-esque grumpiness. (Smith’s still my Doctor though!)

    That scene makes so much sense now. I was slightly confused, especially when they showed the hand.

    One thing I was also wondering were the robots the same as the ones in the first episode or are these ones another species trying to find this Promised Land? I can’t help but see similiarities in the Promised Land. It reminds me of the Utopia idea from S3 where the humans were trying to find refuge and it went against them in the end. At first I thought if this was foreshadowing the Master’s return for season 8 but Moffat’s pretty much said The Master won’t return. Although his words were ‘No. Not really.’ Not quite a no unless I’m reading too much into that.

    Another thing I was wondering (and this is my last nerdy Doctor Who pondering, I swear!)… what’s Gallifrey up to these days? Is Heaven the dimension Gallifrey ended up in?

    Okay, I’ll stop now.

    • cds says:

      Nerd away, Robin! This is a total nerdy-Doctor-Who-pondering zone. Half (if not more) of my Who Reviews consist of my nerdy Doctor Who ponderings. So please–ponder with us! πŸ™‚

      I think the robots in the first episode were “Girl in the Fireplace” robots. These ones… mmm… I’m not so sure. But if my theory about all this having something to do with the Cybermen is correct, then there is a link: creatures that are part human/part machine. We weren’t told if the robots in this story were at all human, but the thing with the gold makes me wonder if they might be robot minions of the Cybermen…?

      As for “Paradise” and “The Promised Land”–an interesting thought that this may be where Gallifrey ended up. I’m waiting for Gallifrey to turn up again as a plot line–and maybe you’re onto something. The link with Utopia in Season 3 is another good thought. There are some serious rumours floating around about the Master’s return, with some saying it’s Missy, and some suggesting Danny Pink is, in fact, the Master. And we know better than to pay attention to anything Moff says about it. Rule 1: Moff lies. His “no” is never a “no” until after the episode broadcasts. πŸ™‚

      Thanks for sharing your nerdy pondering, Robin!

  4. ianrsmith says:

    Hey you. Odd that they had the Doctor meeting Britain’s most ethically ambiguous folk hero and nothing was made of it, especially as they are asking questions about the Doctor’s own ethical and moral compass.

    Largest Smith is thinking there is a Cyberman pay-off in the offing, maybe the original Cybermen with Mondas or Telos being ‘The Promised Land’ as, so far, everyone wanting to go there has been a robot or a cyborg.

    • cds says:

      Hey you, too! Ethically ambiguous? Whereabouts in “Thou shall not steal” does Robin Hood find an exception clause? πŸ™‚ Though I think the Doctor could be accused of similar “moral ambiguity” at times, which is a point I’m not sure Mark Gatiss intended to make, but sits there like the 900 lb gorilla throughout the entire episode. (Unless they edited the gorilla out too–did you see it?)

      Ah! So Smith the Elder is picking up on the same vibes I am! Excellent. πŸ™‚ I wouldn’t rule out the Master being involved, but I like thought that the “Promised Land” could be Telos. I’m not sure how it could be Mondas since that melted back in 1986. But in Who, all–well *most*–things are possible!

  1. January 12, 2022

    3afflicts

Share your thoughts... I usually reply!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.