Who Review: Before the Flood
In the second part of this two-part story, the Doctor has traveled back in time to try to solve the mystery of the flood, and the souls of the dead transmitting messages across time. The Doctor, Bennett, and O’Donnell end up at a Scottish Army base in 1980, the village discovered by the underwater base in the future. The spaceship has just arrived, carrying the body of a warrior called The Fisher King. It seems the spaceship is a hearse. But this Fisher King is far from dead, as the undertaker, Prentis, soon discovers. Meanwhile, the ghost Doctor has a message for the crew of the underwater base. It’s a list of names–the names of those currently in the base, in the order in which they die. And Clara’s next…
SPOILER ALERT!! My comments may (and likely will) contain spoilers for those that havenβt seen the episode. If you want to stay spoiler-free, please watch the story before you continue reading!
Overall this was a good story, and a good resolution to last week’s episode. The idea of going back in time with the sole purpose of changing history has been done before, even though the Doctor himself often says he’s not supposed to do this. We’ve already referenced “Genesis of the Daleks” with the first two-parter. In that story, the Time Lords commission the Fourth Doctor to go back in time and destroy the Daleks at their inception. The Doctor and Romana get caught in a time loop in “Meglos,” and then you have Rose wreaking havoc on the world by saving her father’s life in “Father’s Day.” In this story, writer Toby Whithouse riffs on what’s called the “Bootstrap Paradox.” In this paradox, a time traveler goes back in time and ends up creating something that already exists in his present-day. The example the Doctor gives is of a time traveler who loves Beethoven and goes back to meet his hero, only to discover Beethoven never existed. So the time traveler publishes Beethoven’s music in the 18th century, attributes it to Beethoven, and hence creates the Beethoven whose music he loves. The question is: who actually composed “Beethoven’s” music?
In this story, the Doctor creates his own “ghost” image to relay a message from the past to Clara in the present-day. But the Doctor only knew what message to give the “ghost” because Clara told him what the “ghost” said. So who actually created the “ghost’s” message?
Thankfully, the whole plot didn’t hang on this (as far as I could tell), since that’s a pretty heavy idea to hang a family show on (remember the Charged Vacuum Emboitment from “Full Circle” and “Logopolis”?). I liked the idea that reading the writing on the ship wall turned people into potential carriers of the signal. Once those words got “inside” a person, that person could be killed and used to transmit the message, which the Fisher King intended to use to bring an armada to conquer the Earth. The fact that Lunn never read the message made him immune to the ghosts.
Another good twist was the fact that the present-day Doctor didn’t know that he had created his own “ghost” hologram, so for at least half the show, he was convinced he would die. This added greatly to the tension and drama.
I do have a few quibbles. The biggest is the “prolog” where the Doctor appears to break the “Fourth Wall” to explain the Boostrap Paradox. Couldn’t they have worked that in to the first episode, and find a place for the Doctor to explain it to Clara, or have Clara and the Doctor discuss it? I think it would have worked better as a piece of seemingly throw-away conversation. The Doctor shouldn’t be addressing the audience, though. Maybe we’re supposed to think he was talking to himself. But he wasn’t. And Capaldi didn’t play it like that. No more of that, please.
One way to test whether a monster costume works is to use it in an outdoor scene in broad daylight. It was daring of them to take the Fisher King into that environment, unfortunately I don’t think the costume stood up well. He looked like someone doing cosplay at a Star Trek convention in a really good costume. Something about it didn’t make me think, “woah, that’s an alien.”
Finally, and this is probably the biggest quibble: enough with the sonic sunglasses! Bring back the sonic screwdriver!! It’s always been the Doctor, the TARDIS, and the sonic screwdriver–well, at least ever since “Fury from the Deep” in 1968, and consistently since the Third Doctor in the 70s. Has the merchandise budget become so tight that they’re looking at recycling cheap sunglasses and calling them “sonic”? Give Peter his own screwdriver, people! There must be something going on with this in terms of this season’s story arc. Moff should know better.
What did you think of this episode, and this story?
Good review Colin.
I’m with you on sunglasses and 4th wall. I said to my husband after that intro that they had better come up with a story explanation for that cheesiness – and then they didn’t. I can’t imagine a story arc that justifies the stupid glasses either…
Unfortunately my love for this show has been slowly diminishing ever since Davis was replaced by Moffat. He knew how to do one or two episode arcs but his handling of series-long ones, his lack of subtlety and his writing of the female companions has slowly worn me down.
It’s frustrating, as I like Capaldi, I don’t mind Coleman, and there have been some great moments. This episode was pretty solid, cheesy talking to the camera excluded. But I’m not looking forward to it the way I used to, and that makes me a bit sad.
I was also hoping for something in the story that would explain why the Doctor was talking to camera, but no. This was so reminiscent of “The Feast of Steven”–the episode of “The Dalek’s Master Plan” that broadcast on Christmas Day, 1965. At the end, William Hartnell turned to the camera and wished the viewers a happy Christmas. And the world cringed. I thought we’d learned our lesson with that.
But maybe, as with the sonic glasses, all will be explained and set right in the course of the season. I think these stories are good so far, but there are details like this that I’m not enjoying. I wonder what Moff is up to…?
Hey, it’s Sam Hawke! Fancy seeing you here! I had no idea you were a regular to Colin’s blog too. π
Well I can’t resist a Who discussion! π
And I’m very glad you can’t. Both of you! π
I kind of thought that the Doctor was talking to Clara in that first scene. You know how lately they’ll start shows with something that goes with the climax and then pop back in time? We just don’t see Clara. It appears that the Doctor is talking to us. But that first scene just goes with the last scene with the Doctor asking Clara who composed Beethoven’s symphonies.
At least, that’s how I saw it.
I want to believe that’s what was intended, Liz, and for the love of the show, I’m willing to believe your take is the correct one. π
I would like to believe that, too, but I don’t see why Clara would have been kept out of the scene if so. It was cheese-central.
I hhaatteee the Sonic Sunglasses. Hate them SO MUCH. Moffat gave an interview explaining why he choose them and it was the most frustrating, arrogant, disrespectful thing I’ve seen him do: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrw_2Jp_72Q
I almost enjoyed this episode, but I really wasn’t keen on the ending. It annoyed me how much the Doctor shrugged off O’Donnel’s death and her friend’s heartbreak afterwards. It was such a cold, dis-compassionate way to leave things. I was hoping O’Donnel-who-heard-the-thump might have fled away from the King Fisher for the TARDIS and we’d have some happy ending where she’d stowed away before the flood, but sadly that wasn’t to be.
Apart from that, though: loved the bookends, loved the meta commentary. Loved the guitar intro. Loved the development of how Clara treats others, and how the Doctor treats tagalongs. And I *loved* seeing the emergency protocol kicking in — that thing always give me a lump in my throat after what happened to the Ninth Doctor, so it was a nice change to see Capaldi use it so flippantly.
The addressing-the-audience doesn’t bother me too much — they’ve been toying with that for a while now. I remember they had an interactive red button (I’m sure you’ll know the telly red button, Colin!) extra where, after you watched a live episode of the show, David Tennant would take you on a little adventure.
As a younger viewer, that was the *coolest* thing. The Tenth Doctor talking fondly towards *me*, addressing me as a companion, inviting me on an adventure. Dream come true.
(I FOUND AN INTERACTIVE ONLINE VERSION OF THAT EPISODE WOOHOO. Videos are also on Youtube for a non-interactive/mobile version here with ‘Attack of the Graske START’ followed by numbered AoTGL clips).
So I can’t grudge the show for doing that again with Capaldi. It’s really nice, as a fan, to feel like the Doctor knows you exist.
Thank you so much for your thoughts, Emma. I remember an interview Moff did not so long ago (maybe it was on a panel?) where he was asked why he found the Doctor so appealing. Moff looked to the iconography of the show. We don’t have a warrior who kills people, but we have a Doctor who heals, who makes people better. And he doesn’t carry a gun to destroy, but a screwdriver to fix–it’s constructive. I liked that. John Nathan-Turner got rid of the screwdriver in 1982 (Fifth Doctor story “The Visitation”). RTD brought it back, because to him it was an integral part of the Doctor’s character. I still think it is. And while Capaldi certainly can carry off the sunglasses, let them just be costume, not sonic! π
As for the Doctor’s treatment of O’Donnell’s death, I thought that fitted his personality. Remember the flash cards at the beginning of the first part? Twelve doesn’t have Ten’s compassion.
The Red Button thing was after my time, but I am certainly aware the BBC did that for a while. And perhaps I’m just being a curmudgeonly old-school Whovian, but I prefer to think the Doctor was talking to Clara, not me. π
That’s a very good point about the flash cards — they’re definitely playing Capaldi as a less compassionate Doctor, but it’s so strange to me. Nine and Ten were so *defined* by their love of humanity — Eleven less-so, a bit, but he still cared a lot about saving people. I can’t think of any of the Old Who Doctors who didn’t have the same love of humanity, to the point where it often became their weakness. It feels so strange to lose something that’s been so core to his personality for so long.
Still, these things are cyclical, so I’m sure we’ll see a softer Doctor some time. And it is opening up some very interesting storytelling routes!
Oh Col, The Moff likes to play with fans. He is one too y’know!
The monologue in the beginning worked well for me… Doctor Who can stretch its walls occasionally AND it gave us the lead into the theme tune with electric guitars. Clara/no Clara… The Doctor was talking and I don’t need to know if she was there to hear it.
Right, Sonic Sunglasses. Here’s my take: It’s already been announced who is coming back for the Christmas Special this year and in order for the continuity to be kept intact from Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead, she needs to be given a Sonic Screwdriver. I think the Sonic Glasses are a placeholder until the Doctor gets THAT Sonic Screwdriver. Make sense?