Book Review: THE EDUCATION OF DIXIE DUPREE by Donna Everhart

Eleven-year-old Dixie is the youngest child of Evie and Charles Dupree, who live in Perry County, Alabama. She and her brother AJ like to climb trees and do the normal things kids in rural towns during the late 1960s would do. But home is not sweet for Dixie. Her mother, a transplant from New Hampshire by marriage, is discontented with Southern living. She pines for her New England roots, and is not afraid to let her husband know. Charles responds to his brash, no-nonsense wife with swigs of Sneaky Pete, never for one moment believing she would actually leave. From a young age, Dixie has learned to lie, mostly to cover for the bruises, evidence of Mama’s temper. And then a fight between Mama and Daddy gets out of control, leading to Daddy’s sudden departure, and the arrival of Uncle Ray, Mama’s brother-in-law. Uncle Ray saves the family from the inevitable financial ruin that would come without a bread-winner in the house. He gladly drives Mama to the store and helps her buy groceries. Mama’s temper softens, and all seems well for the family. But things start to unravel for Dixie when Uncle Ray’s intentions come to light, and her history of lying comes back to haunt her…

I have to say upfront that Donna is a friend of mine, which may incline me to review her debut novel favorably no matter what I really think about it. I’m happy to say there are no mixed motives in this review because a) the book has already received high praise, including an Amazon Pick of the Month for November nod, and making the USA Today Bestsellers list, and b) it really is an excellent novel (which is a relief!–though knowing the quality of Donna’s flash fiction, I was sure she had it in her).

Another caveat to my review is that I’m not particularly well-read in Southern Literature. In fact, I think the only other book I’ve read that would be considered in the same category is TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, which I consider to be the best novel ever written. But to pit DIXIE DUPREE against MOCKINGBIRD would be unfair. Aside from the 1960s Alabama settings, the two novels have little in common either in terms of theme or voice. So my thoughts are strictly concerning the book on its own merits, not compared to similar titles.

With all that said, DIXIE DUPREE is an incredible debut. The novel starts with Dixie handing over her diary as evidence against Uncle Ray, so at the outset we know her diary is important, and Uncle Ray is a character we need to keep an eye on. But that’s really all we know. In the following chapters, Dixie’s story unfolds. It’s the story of a child learning how to lie, covering up for the adults in her life because, regardless how wrong their actions are, she is convinced life would be worse if they weren’t there. Only her diary knows the truth.

Dixie’s education is not pleasant, and it makes for tough reading at times. The saving grace, however, is Donna’s voice. Choosing to tell the story from Dixie’s point of view enables her to convey some very dark and graphic scenes with youthful innocence. This doesn’t at all detract from the seriousness of what’s happening, but it does soften some of the harsh edges that a more adult sensibility would add. Nevertheless, this isn’t a book for the overly sensitive.

Indeed, perhaps the greatest strength of the book is Dixie’s voice. It’s clear, distinct, and has the ring of authenticity–exactly how you might imagine a well-read eleven-year-old from Alabama would sound. The other characters are well-defined, with their own quirks and flaws. Brother AJ takes to Uncle Ray in a way only a boy could, oblivious to the things going on with his younger sister. Uncle Ray is charming and helpful, hiding well the dark side that threatens to consume him. Evie, her mother, is a complex mix of anger and devotion. She wants the best for her children, but too easily vents her frustrations on them with devastating results. Charles, her father, is devoted to his family, and doesn’t understand why Evie can’t love his hometown like he does. This leads to much of the conflict between them, and his drinking.

I would recommend DIXIE DUPREE, but, as I said, it’s not for those of a sensitive disposition, though I maintain that Donna deals with the issues in about as sensitive a way as one can. The main character is eleven, but it’s not a book for middle graders. I would rate it R for profanity, and the adult nature of some of the scenes. An easy five Goodreads stars.

cds

Colin D. Smith, writer of blogs and fiction of various sizes.

You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. Hank says:

    Colin;
    I really enjoyed your review. To be truthful, I am only halfway through and I am already preparing myself for the worst. But like you say, Dixie’s voice is so well written, that it pulls you along with her.

    It will be interesting to look back at Donna Everhart’s debut novel and see how it ages. I am willing to bet that you will be able to look back one day and say…”I was a friend of hers when.”

    Again Colin, nice review.
    Cheers Hank

    • cds says:

      Thanks, Hank! I think the story will stand the test of time. Unfortunately, like MOCKINGBIRD, the themes are transcendent, deeply imbedded in our human frailty, and will always resonate. I hope DIXIE continues to do well, not just to bless Donna, but because these stories need to be read. We need to be reminded–especially those of us who will never know what it’s like to live a life like Dixie’s.

      And I’m sure, in the not-too-distant future, we’ll be looking back and saying, “Yeah, I was a friend of hers when…” 🙂

      This was a hard review to write and keep spoiler-free. I hope I succeeded. I’d hate to ruin it for you, especially since you’re half-way in. But even if I did, it’s worth reading to the end anyway.

  2. donnaeve says:

    I was trying to find a paper bag to hyperventilate in to. 🙂

    Seriously. I WAS so nervous, like I tweeted about! IDK why!

    Oh yes, I do. I value your opinion, and knowing your tastes from other reviews, as well as your own personal lifestyle, I just wasn’t sure what you’d think.

    And now I can say WOW! and PHEW! Thank you, Colin. What a thoughtful, and wonderful review! I think you’ve lent just the right touch of suspense, while sharing adequate warnings about those most difficult scenes.

    You’ve done DIXIE proud. And gave me goosebumps!

    ((((hugs))))

    • cds says:

      Wow–thank you, Donna! 🙂

      I sincerely wish you all the best with Dixie, and every novel that comes out after. Your publishing journey has been the stuff of dreams so far, and I hope the dream continues for you–and gets better! By the way, I really enjoyed listening to you sharing your publishing journey at the book launch. It’s was a needed reminder of how different everyone’s path is, and how we should never look to anyone else as a model of what we should do. I don’t recall if you’ve told that story on your blog. If not, you should! 🙂

  3. AJ Blythe says:

    Just shows how different reading experiences are, because in my review I wrote I’m not sure whether it is the southern setting, or the young protag, or the heavy subject matter but when I was reading this it reminded me of “To Kill a Mockingbird”. Mind you, I wouldn’t say TKAM is the best book ever written, so we’re definitely coming at it from two very different positions.

    I love how readers take different things from books. I guess it’s our life experiences, previous reading material and how we’re introduced to a book in the first place! I know for TKAM we had to read it in high school and analysed it to death. I know I really enjoyed it because I got in trouble from the teacher for reading it all in that first night – she’d planned for us to spend all our lessons that week silent reading the book in class! But I think when you then have to analyse every word and theme some of the magic is lost.

    In year 10 a school reader was Lord of the Flies. We analysed it and pulled out the themes for discussion… and then at the end of the term our teacher gave us an article to read by the author (William Golding) in which he stated he wasn’t trying to create deep and meaningful themes with the book. He’d just had an idea where he wondered what would happen if a bunch of boys were left to their own devices and that was the outcome.

    I think that’s the magic of books. It lets the reader be transported to another place, and what they take away from that is personal to them – regardless of what the author wanted or what other readers think!

    • cds says:

      First, to clarify, I didn’t say TKaM is the best book ever–that spot was taken a long, long time ago–but definitely the best *novel* ever written (IMO, of course). I didn’t always hold this view. We were forced to read TKaM in school too, when I was about 14. I hated it. Granted, I only read the first few pages, but I couldn’t get any further. I told our English teacher I thought it was a “boring book.” He told me that was a “philistine remark.” 🙂 About five years ago, I decided to give it a second chance. It was only then I realized he was right. I couldn’t fault it in terms of character, plot, pacing, voice–whatever criteria I might use to critique a novel.

      Yes, both TKaM and DIXIE are set in Alabama, and have young protagonists, and deal with heavy subjects. And while I think your comparison constitutes glowing praise (and Donna deserves glowing praise for DIXIE), I don’t think it’s a fair comparison. The issues are different, the social environments are different (IIRC, TKaM is set in the 1930s), the protagonists’ home environments are very different, and the voices are different.

      But that’s just my view. You’re right to note how people can come at the same book from varying angles and see different things. And in the end, we both agree that this is a stellar work by a talented writer. 🙂

      • AJ Blythe says:

        Good pick up on “novel” versus “book” – you’re right, I should be more careful with my wording. And totally agree… awesome work by awesome writer.

        (And funny how you couldn’t read TKAM as a teenager but came back to it – I haven’t been able to revisit – the over-analysis spoilt it for me)

  4. donnaeve says:

    Great discussion AJ and Colin! For me, and much like the author of LORD OF THE FLIES AJ mentions, I didn’t set out with any sort of agenda about the book and it’s themes, tough topics or for that matter, to be used as an educational resource – as has been suggested.

    Coming from the angle of having read many of these sorts of books, i.e. coming of age, Southern, and dealing with dark subjects, (BASTARD OUT OF CAROLINA, THE SECRET LIFE OF BEES, ELLEN FOSTER, etc. etc) I realized I wanted to write a book of that caliber, but in my own way. And part of why I wrote it the way I did was because no one had dared. And because the story didn’t ring true (at least to me) when I tried to skirt around those really hard scenes, especially because Dixie is talking and she wouldn’t fluff it up. She wouldn’t avoid it since she’s open and honest with herself – if no one else.

    I’ve made some folks angry. I’ve probably disgusted a few. That’s not what I wanted to do, but like you’re both saying, people read and come at a story from differing viewpoints, and it hits some of them right, and others…eh, not so much. And that is perfectly fine! Look at Donna Tartt’s THE GOLDFINCH. Some didn’t like it and questioned the Pulitzer.

    You sure can’t please everyone!

    Anyway, thank you both for your stupendous and very kind words!

  1. January 12, 2022

    2excruciating

Share your thoughts... I usually reply!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.